Malik
(1/31/11)
I had to take a week to
get some real priorities in order. While I find a good deal of
enjoyment from posting my random ramblings here, I also need to
occasionally get my stuff in order and allow my mind some time to
get back to full strength. Here are some thoughts from the last week
that I would've normally posted...
LittleBigPlanet 2 is
pretty damned sweet. The main game (story mode) is a bit lacking
versus the story mode from LBP. It's not bad, but it feels short and
too focused on a boss fight each world. I wouldn't have minded more
of a standard LBP approach that ended with a single big boss fight
instead of numerous little ones. However, the variety of game styles
in the story mode are pretty cool with some platforming being broken
up with old school shooter style (think Raiden or Gradius), a level
of rail shooting, and some neat little bonuses for exploring levels
to their fullest. There is definitely more hidden on this game than
LBP had, but LBP2 still feels a bit too short.
I haven't tried many
community levels on LBP2, but I do like the potential that I'm
seeing. One level that really blew me away was a recreation of the
first dungeon from Zelda 1, using an overhead view with the same
Zelda style controls of the d-pad, a sword button, an item button
(you get the boomerang, bow, and bombs), and a menu button. It all
looks so authentic to the original Zelda. The only thing lacking was
that the level moved a bit slowly. Other than the speed issue, this
level truly shows that LBP2 has serious potential beyond what I ever
expected. To find this level, use the Mm Picks sort option and look
for Zelda Dungeon.
The next generation
portable wars are not exactly wowing me. I will probably get a 3DS
since I like the RPG selection that the DS family has given. I also
like the built-in features, however I'm not wanting to spend extra
for them. Mainly I just want the games that I know will come in the
lines of classic RPG remakes, puzzle games (Professor Layton), and
the Nintendo made first party titles. Still, if the system ends up
like the DS did, the games will come in time and soon there will be
too many to pick from.
As for the NGP (PSP2)
from Sony...I'm happy and I don't want it. I'm happy because with
the second analogue stick, real analogue style sticks (not the PSP
disk of lameness), and the back touch screen (to replicate the
previously missing L2 and R2 buttons), I see good potential. I mean
the system supposedly can run PS3 games ported directly from the PS3
without any modifications to the software coding. That sounds
amazing.
So, why would I not want
the NGP? Well, I had a PSP for a year and a half before two things
happened. One was that I realized the system was fragile and poorly
designed (especially the square button being unresponsive at times).
The other is that I realized all I used the thing for was homebrew.
I couldn't find enough games to make it worth the time and money to
own the PSP. More so, the few enjoyable games were usually limited
by sloppy coding. If I really wanted a homebrew system with no
games, I could have been far better off with a GP32 or any of it's
family. So, once again, unless the games really start to put on the
awe-factor, I just can't waste money on something that would turn
into little more than a novelty in my hands.
On a final note, I just
don't feel the NFL now. The Super Bowl is lined up to be the Packers
and Steelers, which is just not interesting for me. I want to see
the Steelers go down, but I have a bad feeling I'll be seeing, once
again, the black and gold taking apart all challengers. In the big
game, the Steelers are just too damned good, and they have the
definite Super Bowl experience versus the current roster of the
Packers.
I'm also not feeling the
NFL since I think a stupid thing is on the horizon. I'm talking the
labor issues facing the league in the next couple of months. I don't
want a lock-out, but I sure feel like one is almost guaranteed at
this point. Too many stupid things are happening, and too few people
want to step up and act like the responsible adults they are all
supposed to be. If I wanted to see a bunch of childish decisions, I
have better ways than to keep reading about NFL name calling and
some rather lame demands (like the NFL wanting 18 games without
addressing the injury issues currently in the league...I'd love more
NFL games a year, but not if it meant more injuries making more lame
games).
Malik |
Malik
(2/3/11)
I have been following
Rock Band pretty regularly, but haven't touched the game for quite
some time. I mean some of the recent DLC is pretty sweet (David
Bowie 5-pack, for example) but it's just not enough to get me back
into the game. So, I stopped paying attention last week. One week
without paying attention, and look what happens;
I've been wanting
one album for a long time on Rock Band. I'm talking about one of the
best known punk albums of all time. An album that is constantly
voted in the top of any type of "Top Rock Albums of All Time" type
lists. One album that redefined the sounds of music in a good number
of ways. One album that is amazing in it's ability to sound so
unique with each song, but still sound true to the artist in every
way. One album that is even bringing about a biographical style
movie in the near future on its creation. One album to bring about
so much variety and fun. One truly amazing album.
So, the one week I
stop checking Rock Band DLC announcements it when London Calling
comes along! The one week I stop looking is when the album I crave
so damned much has to try to sneak past me. If it wasn't for getting
the weekly DLC update email from the Playstation Network, and for
once reading over it and not just deleting it, I wouldn't have even
known that it came along.
Anyway, I think
tonight is the night I get off my butt for once and get back to
playing games again. It's been too comfortable just watching DVR of
Doctor Who. It's time to pick up my fake guitar and enjoy the simple
wondrous pleasures of geeking out again.
Malik |
Malik
(2/4/11)
I am back from my time
off from posting, but I still am realizing I have little to actually
say. I've been far too mellow lately. This equates to me mainly
sitting on my couch and watching some DVR recordings of random
History channel and BBC America stuff. Not exactly something worthy
of posting about.
The only thing on
my mind right now that is in any way tied in to regular geek
material is the weather that is going crazy around the world. Most
of it is just pure scientific style curiosity, but a little does fit
in to the grander scheme of things. For example, Dallas Texas is
supposed to be a nice place for the Super Bowl. It's a warmer state
with mild winters. Tell that to Mother Nature.
When you have
Dallas in extreme weird weather followed by Indy and then New York,
you can see some wacky conditions on the horizon for the Super Bowl
in the next three years. Yes, Dallas will be enclosed with the roof
for this year, but it doesn't stop the airports from canceling
flights. This isn't even looking at New York in a couple years, with
New York style winter weather. All of this together, however, makes
me think of one fact I've felt for a long time; why not have the
Super Bowl in any NFL city with a regular rotation like the MLS does
with their championship game? I mean Detroit had the Super Bowl five
years ago, and New York in two years, and they sure as hell have
some of the more potent winter forecasts at this time of year.
I understand that
weather is not desired as a factor in the big game when you want
just the two best teams facing off with an equal footing. However,
would you rather see, potentially, a blizzard or sever wind storms
in New York or mild rain and temperatures in the 40's and 50's in
Seattle? I know that I'd love to see Seattle added to the mix,
because I'm a Seattle native. However, I'd also love to see most of
the major NFL cities get involved since the weather is no longer
being a factor with the 2012 New York decision. As it stands, there
is a decent chance that a southern team, like Dallas, the Cards, the
Fins, or almost any other with a quality stadium or a stadium with
history to it could have a home field advantage Super Bowl (assuming
these teams can get their acts together in the future), but northern
teams are usually left without a single bit of that possibility.
Anyway, I'm still
not too interested in the match up of the Steelers and Packers this
year. Does it mean I'll skip the Super Bowl and do something else?
No. It just means I am not nearly as interested as I'd be with
nearly any other match up (particularly one without the Steelers,
who just seem to be too constant of a factor in the Super Bowl).
Malik |