Malik
(8/20/04)
It's Friday again,
so here we find ourselves, once again, in my bitchy mind. I
personally found one of these items to be of great importance to
myself...that being about the corruption of GTA by Rockstar.
However, I offer a nice variety, today, of different aspects of the
geek life. On one hand, we have gaming with GTA,
on another hand we have upgrading and compatibility bullshit, and on
the third hand (when you're sleep deprived, you're allowed as many
hands as you want) we have the crap of the email providers currently
out there. Anyway, as you all know, I'm Malik and I'll be your
host for tonight.
We Just Weren't
Compatible
Despite how many
of my friends told me to do otherwise, I was using Windows 98 Update
for the last couple of years. I kept getting the warnings from my
friends that my OS was crappy and obsolete, but I didn't listen. I
mean, why should I spend $100 to upgrade to XP when everything is
compatible with 98 Update and newer Windows platforms? Maybe, just
maybe, because most manufacturers of hardware are lying
whores.
So, this last
weekend, I finally hit the wall. I had started to a do a good deal
of Bit-Torrent downloads, and my client of choice (ABC) kept
crashing. I looked at the options and found one that mentioned if
you have too many open ports at once, older OSes, like 98 Update,
could cause the program to crash. So, I tried to lower the maximum
number of open ports that ABC had access to...what do you know, it
stopped freezing and crashing. So, when City of Heroes kept losing
it's connection to the MapServer, and my Comcast fix (check out last
weeks posts) didn't fully fix it, I decided maybe 98 Update had to
be the blame.
That's when I
bought the upgrade to XP. After upgrading, some of my hardware
failed on me. So, I decided to install from the driver disks. This
is something I never did fully before, since the driver CDs for my
motherboard (including my NIC), my sound card, and a few other
drivers would never install correctly...instead, they would just
crash my PC during the install. So, after popping in each CD, I went
through the install processes and had no hang ups. However, when
looking at the drivers and original packages for my hardware
components that needed a fresh install on XP, I could clearly see
that they all required Windows 98 Update or better for the OS
requirement.
So, what's my
beef? It's simply that hardware manufacturers are a bunch of lying
whores. When Shuttle said my motherboard and it's drivers were 98
Update compatible, and they failed on 98 Update but worked on
XP...and then my drivers from Creative Labs for my sound card, which
is 98 Update "compatible" and it worked on XP but not 98
Update...well, you see the trend, right? Is there really a purpose
in lying so blatantly like this? True, I did get these items to work
previously on my 98 Update OS...but that was only after downloading
some custom drivers from some of the more geekish of tech support
sites (the ones that are ran by some dedicated geeks who get paid
nothing more than with a sense of geekish satisfaction at making
their own drivers and customer support sites for people who aren't
their customers).
Solution
As I learned, the
main solution for anything, is to always rely on the true geeks.
However, that was my personal solution. If I didn't have another PC
to download my NIC drivers from, I would have never got my Internet
connection running while I was running under 98 Update. There is no
reason that you should not be able to believe a hardware
manufacturer when they say your OS can handle their product...well,
logically there isn't. What do they have to gain by lying...only a
headache from those who go to customer support before hitting up the
geeks for the solution to some really crappy advise on what is
required.
However, the real
solution to this crap would be something more along the lines of
hardware manufacturers actually testing their products on all of the
required systems that they say can handle it. I mean, what ever
happened to quality testing and quality assurance? That is where the
real solutions should be found...in other words, those who make a
product, should ensure that their product will work as specified.
Blah.
It Won't End
Recently at
gamespot.com, they had a poll on what people are most anticipating
for GTA:SA. The options include; "Swimming", "Riding
a bike", "Home invasion", "Getting
tattoos", "Rollin' around Los Santos", and
"Pigging out on junk food". Why is it that I see some bad
things in the future for GTA:SA. I mean some of these options are
not that bad, but others just make me cringe...especially
considering some people are actually looking forward to them.
The bike riding
will be a fun little diversion...for the first half-hour. After
that, it will be as exciting as riding a Fagio around in GTA:VC...which
is to say, that when you're being chased by the cops, you will
probably not chose the bike over running on foot. This is just not a
major addition to the GTA game play and it's not something to get
hyped about. Unlike the motorcycles or helicopters of VC, the bike
is not adding a new vehicle as much as a really stripped down
version of the good old motorcycles. As for the ability to do some
tricks and shit on the bikes of SA...this is GTA, not a freakin'
extreme sports game like Dave Mirra BMX, so this is not
needed.
The swimming, I
will admit, has some potential. However, it all depends on how the
controls are put in place for going from one part of the SA state to
another. If there are boundaries in place, like there were in the
previous 2 GTA titles, then swimming may be a bad thing. I
personally don't think the ability to go everywhere from the
beginning would be a good idea. Part of the fun of the previous two
games was how you would work your way into new areas. It served as a
reward system that also kept the hidden packages under control.
Without a boundary system, the balance of the game play could go to
crap when all the hidden packages could be found prior to starting
any of the real missions.
Now, the home
invasions seem like they could be fun...once again, for the first 30
minutes. GTA is not about robbing homes; it's about working your way
up and out of the lower crime life to the big time. The home
invasions would only be as important, to the overall experience, as
the robberies were in GTA:VC...I know of no one who actually gave a
shit about them. You didn't get enough money, the challenge was not
all the much (there was always a pay-n-spray nearby), and the thrill
was minimal. Also, with the movies I've seen of SA, I can already
tell that the interior designs are quite lacking and have a bit too
much of a Max Payne feel to them...which is to say, they don't have
a GTA feel to them.
As for the whole
getting tattoos, getting a hair cut, or whatever things you can do
to alter your image...blah. Who honestly cares. In the end, it's as
important of a feature of getting a purple GCN versus getting a
black GCN. It won't affect the game play and it wont do anything
special beyond making you feel more like you have total control over
the world...despite the fact that you don't. This is not really a
bad feature, I should add. Since you don't actually have to worry
about any changes to the game play, it doesn't matter one way or
another.
On the same note,
the setting wont really make too much of a difference on the game
play. I mean as long as it's set in some nice sprawling metropolis
type setting, it's GTA and it's all good. I mean, what does it
matter if it's one type of town or another...East side, West side,
South side...who really cares. In the end, the location doesn't
matter anywhere as much as what the city/state is actually like in
game play. I mean with VC everyone got excited about playing in
Florida (or a Florida inspired city, I should say), but did that
really pan out in the end? I think not...I mean all you need to do
is remember the complete lack of hills and the one-dimensional
aspects of the land. There was nothing to really keep one interested
in the same ways that Liberty City had. LC had big hills, cliffs,
rivers, gorges, wilderness, a subway system, etc. It's not the
setting that matters nearly as much as the application of the
setting and the exploration options it brings about...hell, this
could be set in an imaginary metropolis in Alaska and I'd love it as
long as the city or state actually had more than one-dimensional
(that being the lack of a third dimension) aspect to it.
Lastly, there is
the issue of food. Ok, I play certain games for certain reasons. In
The Sims, I like to eat and sleep. In Tony Hawk, I like to pull
insane tricks as I jump across a massive gap. In GTA, I like to do
missions and explore...and, of course, go on crazy rampages. You'll
notice, I didn't say I want to play GTA to have a requirement of
eating. In fact, besides how this can alter your appearance (which,
as I said above, is all well and good since it won't change the game
play), it will only serve to bog the game down with pointless
hunting for food. I know that when I started a rampage (not as in
the in game special bonus rampage missions...just total chaos in a
crime spree type of setting) of sorts on VC or GTA3, it could last
for (in game time) a week or more before I either gave up, got
busted, died, or hit the pay-n-spray. What will this mean in GTA:SA?
Simply...half way through my rampage, I will have to find food or
suffer a quick end to the chaos when I no longer can handle a
firearm or run like hell from looking like a Somalia refugee. This
will affect the game play horribly. Plus, while you spend some time
hunting for hidden packages, hidden weapons, or just learning the
layout of the world, you will have to take many unneeded breaks to
keep poor old CJ full and not chunky. There are many good ways to
add time to a game...food is never one of them. Hell...if you look
at Dark Cloud and DC2, you will see that they removed their equivalent
to food (the thirst meter). Why would they do this, unless they
noticed how much it messed up what should be a great game
experience? Actually, that would be the reason.
Solution
People buy GTA
games because they have a lot to offer. If you add more to the
table, you will only result in having a poorly designed game that
cannot tell what genre it belongs to. As the old saying goes,
"too many cooks spoil the broth". Well, too many features
spoil a good game.
Considering how
the GTA series will obviously be around for another dozen sequels,
it would be best to offer a smaller number of new features at once,
and then adjust the next title according to what works and what
doesn't. With this massive offering of new features, Rockstar is
setting themselves up for a fall. If the game is not received
favorably, it will be far harder to create another GTA title when
it's harder to pinpoint the true problems from SA (even if the fans
become vocal and say X ruined the game...it could be a mixture of
feature X when feature Y is present and the real solution would be
to remove feature Y and to leave feature X alone...like the saying
goes; the whole game could be more than just the sum of it's parts).
So, in a nut-shell, the real solution is for GTA to remain true to
it's own self. This means eliminating all ideas of food (or possible
future ones of sleep, drinking, or whatever else Rockstar can see
working for The Sims), tricks on your bicycle, and all other un-GTA
features. I've pre-ordered GTA:SA with GTA in mind...not some lame
ass hybrid of The Sims, GTA, Max Payne, Dave Mirra, Manhunt, and
Postal. I just hope these new features don't kill what has been a
hella sweet franchise.
Also, for that
poll on Gamespot.com...the proper choice to vote for would be the
invisible one; "More of the good old GTA franchise that so
rarely disappoints".
The Email Game...A
Game of Only Losers
I know this is a
little off topic, since I like to keep things focused (even though I
often fail...) on gaming. However, this is something that is just beginning
to drive me insane with frustration...that being the lack of quality
on email providers. I especially mention this since, while I have
the Geek-Asylum.com email, I cannot check some of my email at all
locations unless it's a web-based one (which is also why, if you
have a need to contact me, I will not be able to get back to you
immediately, blah, blah).
Anyway, on one
front, we have my favorite (let's start on the best note); Yahoo.
While Yahoo does a great job of having a good bandwidth and
constantly reliable servers, they fail in one very important area;
Spam. When I take the time to mark a message as spam, I like for my
email provider to remember that...and the same goes for when I mark
something as not spam. I've missed far too many emails in the last
month or so as Yahoo keeps sending stuff I mark as "not
spam" as spam. At the same time, my inbox is exploding as
certain emails, that are always from the same address, are being
marked as spam but not being treated any differently than a clean
message from one of actual contacts. This is beginning to eat away
at my sanity as I miss out on important emails (or at least find
them too late to respond) as they get sent to my junk mail
folder.
However, at least
Yahoo has Hotmail beat in the storage space and the constantly
running server situations. Hotmail, which has lag-prone servers (how
many times a day do I get the "Server busy. Try again
later." message?), no storage space, and plenty of empty
promises. Empty promises? Yup. Hotmail promised an email would come
in two weeks to let me know about my increased storage of
250MB...that 2 week deadline passed a month ago...and I know of
people who had this deadline pass over 2 months ago. When I
contacted Hotmail about this, instead of an answer to the question
of where my extra space was, I got a reply that said, in very polite
wording, something along the lines of, "I have no clue...but
it's coming...someday". At the same time, Hotmail keeps
crowding my overfull inbox (that's at an antiquated 2MB) with
amazing announcements about the many new features, like better virus
protection (which I have the best protection already in place; it's
called I don't open attachments without checking out the sender
first...that and I can't receive attachments with my tiny
2MB...maybe that was Hotmail's way of getting rid of viruses). Best
of all, these announcements from Hotmail fill up the tiny sliver of
space I have remaining. This amount of space may have been nice back
when I got my first Hotmail account...back when a 500MB hard drive
was beyond hi-tech...but this just doesn't cut it now that 2MB is
less memory than a common portable storage device.
Then there is
Google's offering. While Google did have some problems beyond their
control (namely, that would be California's government), now that
things are up and running, there seems to be no end to the Gmail
beta testing. Seriously, I may be a bit on the ignorant ways of
email (which I'm not), but should an email service require more time
with a beta test than many video games? I think not.
Meanwhile, many of
the other free email services are going belly up or changing their
policies to be paid services (who in their right mind would pay for
email when there is so much free email out there?).
Solution
The world, or the
Internet world I should say, needs a sharp wake up call. Yahoo needs
to tweak their service to actually block certain addresses when you
mark them as spam. Hotmail needs to stop jerking us around and stop
acting all high and mighty when they offer new virus protection
(which any email provider will give you for free) as the solution to
forgetting their promises of upgrading to an inbox size that is no
longer pathetic for the mid-90's. Last of all, Google needs to get
over how cool they are, and yet being so overly cautious, and just
release their shit already to the public.
Ok, that's the end
of my way off topic bitching.
Conclusion
I'm still most
bitchy about any new developments on GTA:SA. But that's for a really
good reason; Rockstar has some retarded concept of making a cash-cow
franchise into something that it's not. How stupid do you have to be
to turn something as straight forward as GTA into a mix of Manhunt,
The Sims, a Richard Simmons infomercial, and a slight bit of
character creation from an MMORPG? I'd say pretty damned stupid. If
this keeps up, and Rockstar doesn't release some news about GTA:SA
that makes the game sound good...sigh...I won't do a damned thing,
but I know I'll be playing VC after SA to remind me of what a good
GTA is like...then I'll play GTA3 to remind me of what a great GTA
game is like. At least it's based on California, which is not
completely flat like Florida (GTA without hills = GTA with reduced
fun). Anyway, if you've got a problem, you know what to do...and
them you can feel free to write
me you little opinion or put it on the forums.
Malik
|